🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have voted to withdraw from an international accord designed to protect women from violence, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in Riga this past week to oppose the decision. The ultimate decision now rests with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last year, requiring authorities to develop laws and support services to eliminate all forms of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a move that rights groups characterized as a significant regression for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet conservative factions have contended that its emphasis on gender equality undermines traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a action sponsored by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Responses

One of the primary political groups advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked broad outcry both inside the country and abroad.

22,000 individuals have endorsed a national appeal calling for the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for the coming week, accusing MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The head of the European organization's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a rash decision fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since Turkey left the convention in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds majority, the head of state could possibly return the bill for further review if he holds concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the decision according to legal principles, "considering state and legal considerations, rather than belief-based viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in our nation but throughout Europe," stated a rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in several European countries
• The European treaty requires specific legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could affect comparable discussions in additional EU countries